Skip to content

Creative Writing Competition

April 26, 2012

Over 265 passionate and talented writers participated in the Coppell Gifted Association’s 2011-2012 Creative Writing Contest. The third through twelfth grade participants submitted poetry, fiction, and non-fiction works in December and winners were announced the week of February 6.

Twenty judges supported the competition this year by reviewing the entries and selecting the winners. Our judging panel included authors, teachers, librarians, and administrators. The student’s writings were judged primarily on artistic expression; however, technical merit was also a factor.

Congratulations to the young writers who received 1st place or honorable mention in this annual creative writing competition. The judging panel was very complimentary of all entries received. The Book Release Party was held April 4, 2012. Pam Cope, celebrated author of Jantsen’s Gift attended as a special guest.

The winning entries have been published in a book that is available for purchase for $20 each. If you are interesting in purchasing a copy please contact Elizabeth Chappell, President Coppell Gifted Association, at President@CoppellGifted.org.

From left to right, in the back row: Kelly Hall, Abhi Manivannan, Ananya Rajesh, & Ardi Saunders;  middle row: Isabelle Hernandez, Maddie Hulcy, Katy Lee & Manasi Ramadurgum; front row: Ashley Rivera, Anvita Ukidwe, Isabella Zeff & Emilie Sangerhausen.  Not present: Rachel Sandle & Aadam Husain.

This is an annual event.  Please click here for more information. 

Meet the 2012 CISD School Board Candidates

April 19, 2012

You have the opportunity to meet the candidates on May 3, as well as hear Todd Kettler, CISD Director of Advanced Academics, describe the Big Picture of the GT program for K-12th grade.  Click here for more information.

The CGA posed five questions to the 3 candidates running for the Coppell ISD Board of Trustees this Spring.  Judy Barbo and Carrie Clark are running for Place 6.   Tracy Fisher is running  for Place 7; her opponent withdrew, but the name will still appear on the ballot .  The following are their responses to the questions.

Early Voting

April 30-May 4 (Mon-Fri) 8am – 5pm

May 5 (Sat) 8am – 5pm

May 6 (Sun) 1pm – 7pm

May 7 & 8 (Mon-Tues) 7am-7pm

Election Day – May 12 (Sat) 7am-7pm

Early voting locations will be at Coppell Town Center as well as other locations in Dallas County.  On Election Day, you must vote in your precinct.  To find your precinct, visit the Dallas County Elections website.

1. How do you think CISD has done with gifted education and what do you think they could do better?

Carrie Clark- Place 6 Candidate-

At the elementary level, we use a pull-out enrichment program called Challenge.     In addition to the pull out program of Challenge, 1st-5th identified gifted kids are grouped in classroom clusters.  This allows the teachers to improve differentiation and increase the depth of study for those children ready for that.

While our GT cluster teachers have GT training, the implementation of differentiation from classroom to classroom will vary based on the skill of the instructor.    With larger class sizes compared to past years, providing this differentiation will have additional challenges.

Something we do not do at the elementary level is to allow children to really move up in an area they are particularly skilled at (for example to move up a grade in math instruction).  Rather we rely on differentiation in the classroom to meet even these wider needs.

I do think the Problem Based Learning models being used in a couple of our elementary schools will allow the GT student to work at their level and will be challenged.  Because they are sharing “what they know” and deciding “what they need to know”, ideally they will have more opportunity to explore at a deeper level.

For middle school students, I think we’ve done an excellent job at providing options.  The ability to take up to all four core classes at the GT level  allows the student the ability to customize their challenge level and areas.  These classes also emphasize critical thinking and creativity, which further challenge the GT student.    Should a GT student not want to take a course at the GT level, they can also look at the Pre-AP option for most classes.  I also really like that CISD allows each student  an opportunity to take the Pre-AP courses in middle school if they desire to without a admittance requirement.  This allows any student the opportunity to take a more rigorous course of study if they wish.

While I have not personally experienced high school at the GT level, the opportunities at this level seem almost endless.  There are GT courses in all four subject areas available.  There are Pre-AP and  AP courses available based on grade level (and these are also open to all students).  AP exams in more than 20 different subjects were given at CHS last year.  We also have our IB program, dual credit programs, academies, and New Tech’s problem based learning model.  While many of these are open to any student (not just gifted) they allow many different lenses for learning.  And the more interested  the student is, them more engaged they will be which will only enhance their learning.

Judy Barbo- Place 6 Candidate-

I believe the high school and middle schools have done a good job of giving the students who want to challenge themselves opportunities to do so.  At the high school level, there are a plethora of choices to take from the IB program, AP classes, GT classes, online courses and dual credit courses.  Coppell has done a great job preparing these students to excel and allowing them to challenge themselves through these options.  At the middle school level, students are allowed to take classes above their current grade level.  It is very common for an eighth grader to have at least 2 high school credits out of the way before entering high school as a freshman and many students have more.  These students are thriving and the programs are working well.  The elementary levels seem to be where there is more work to be done.  Some of the elementary schools are grouping the gifted children into a couple of classrooms per grade level and others have not adopted this practice.  By grouping the gifted children into specific groups, this allows them to benefit from appropriate instruction on advanced subject matters.  Through technology, such as online courses, iPads, iTouches, etc., gifted students are also able to expand their learning.  The training and resources for teachers still needs to increase, but the district is focused on improving in these areas.

Tracy Fisher- Place 7 Candidate-

CISD has made great strides the past six years in Coppell middle schools by offering GT sections in all core classes vs. only language arts.  CHS has grown to ten official core courses for GT students (4 English, 3 science, 2 math, and 1 history).  I expect CHS will continue to offer more of these core courses at a GT level.

 Number of Core GT Courses Offered

School Level

2005-2006

2011-2012

High School* (Gr 9-12)

4 out of 16 possible

10 out of 16 possible

Middle Schools (Gr 6-8)

3 out of 12 possible

12 out of 12 possible

Elementary School (Gr 1-5)**

0 out of 20 possible

0 out of 20 possible

*    The differentiation necessary because of fewer students at New Tech, IB, and CHS Academies are not reflected in these numbers.

**  Elementary schools vary in their grouping of GT students.  Many split the GT kids up equally between all sections of each grade.

GT instruction at most elementary schools, however, looks much the same from the outside as it has in the past.  Each school has a GT specialist who teaches the Challenge pull out program.  More work is being done in some schools through differentiation in the regular classroom often with support from the specialists. There is still much more work to be done with grouping and curriculum to optimize the learning of the young academically gifted.  While I have confidence that the momentum is swinging towards improving the annual educational growth of these students, I fear the new STAAR testing system could set this progress back.  Stay tuned.

CISD needs to continue to encourage the elementary school principals, counselors, and their lead teachers to support and direct the educational needs of all students, including the academically gifted.  Sometimes students are still grouped in school without regard for academic needs because of other more pressing concerns like equally distributing behavior or high test scorers.

Finally, CISD should persist in monitoring existing GT classes to ensure they are truly GT courses.

2. What is your experience with gifted education?

Carrie Clark- Place 6 Candidate-

My oldest daughter (now in 7th grade) was identified gifted in kindergarten.  She has been through the Challenge program at elementary school since being identified; and is now enjoying the GT courses in all four subject areas in middle school.  I also have two other children who are not identified as gifted in elementary school.

Judy Barbo- Place 6 Candidate-

Although my children have not been a part of the GT programs, they have greatly benefited from taking Pre/AP courses, AP courses, online college courses and dual credit.  Both of my children have taken the opportunity to earn high school credits before entering their freshman year.

Tracy Fisher- Place 7 Candidate-

I am a parent of two academically gifted students and the founder and past president of Coppell Gifted Association.  I have been a member of Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented (TAGT) for more than five years and a member of National Association for Gifted Children in the past, as well as have attended annual professional conferences at both.  I have attended TAGT parent conferences where I have been a speaker for three years.  I also serve on the TAGT executive board as the newly appointed parent member.

I understand a great deal about gifted education. Besides discovering that most educators get very little information to prepare them to teach the academically gifted, I have also learned that reaching a student where they are academically is also a parent responsibility.  All parents must enrich their sons and daughters, but gifted children especially benefit from academic enrichment outside of school such as music lessons, language lessons, chess clubs, math clubs, Destination Imagination, etc.  Parents play a key role in their children’s education.

3.  How might students in the CISD benefit from the findings of the national report released in 2004, “A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students”?

Carrie Clark- Place 6 Candidate-

The focus of “A Nation Deceived” is how acceleration (either subject acceleration or entire grade level acceleration) can benefit gifted students.    I believe that our middle school and high school students currently have great opportunities to accelerate on different subjects during their secondary years.  Some of the most commonly seen in CISD are testing to accelerate in courses (usually mathematics), taking high school credit courses in middle school, taking dual credit courses for college credit, and the IB program.

In elementary, acceleration is available by passing a test on an entire grade level.  This can help the student who is ahead in all areas, but does not do anything help a student who is ahead in a specific area.  Instead we rely on differentiation in the classroom and the Challenge program for this enrichment.

I think the district should consider all options that help to engage students.  For those gifted students of any level that are not being adequately challenged, we must look at ways to offer that challenge.  I think we should not accelerate without reason, but should look at the whole child (especially younger ones) to see if there are ways that we might improve their school experience.    While acceleration may or may not be the right choice in every situation, I think acceleration should certainly be one of the things that we consider.

Judy Barbo- Place 6 Candidate-

I believe the report gives great insight as to the benefits of grade skipping and accelerated learning for students.  Students within our district need to be challenged and the report gives good examples of how to provide the students with a more rigorous curriculum without necessarily skipping grades.  When you look at grade skipping by only looking at grades and not all of the other aspects of being in school that isn’t fair to the student.  I believe the district can benefit through this study by continuing to research ways to address and meet the needs of the gifted students through differentiated curriculum designed to address the needs of each individual learner.

Tracy Fisher- Place 7 Candidate-

About three years ago I ordered and distributed copies of “A Nation Deceived…” to the CISD Board of Trustees during a monthly board meeting.  There is empirical evidence in this study and its follow up report that students should be taught at the level they have reached academically without regard to social pressures (i.e., child is “immature,” too small, etc.)

So many benefits result when any student is challenged continuously in school.  They learn that school is a place to learn, not to wait.  They understand better how they are different and their confidence increases when they are allowed to flourish.  They get to college and don’t melt down when challenged for the first time because they were always challenged in school.  I could talk about this for days…

CISD would benefit from continued discussion about acceleration.  I know that societal pressures cause most people to simply dismiss any thoughts about acceleration so this is an up hill battle, but it still warrants discussion from educators who are the true experts on teaching our children.

Of course, sometimes acceleration is not the answer and more rigor in the current course level is key. There may not be one answer for all but depends on the student and teacher teaching the course.  So much is teacher dependent and without accountability for academic growth without a ceiling (TAKS performance is the current standard), it is difficult to really know how much progress is being made in the classroom.

4.  What is your opinion of ability grouping at CISD elementary schools?

Carrie Clark- Place 6 Candidate-

I think the top priority for CISD related to gifted education is our elementary programs.  We’ve got great programs in middle and high school, and I’d love to see some additional innovation in our elementary programs to further improve them so our gifted students benefit from GT oriented instruction on a day to day and hour to hour basis.  This innovation could come in many forms – ability grouping, improving differentiation, acceleration as well as other.

Judy Barbo- Place 6 Candidate-

In my opinion, I feel that ability grouping is probably the top priority and the opportunities at the elementary level are the greatest.  By grouping the gifted children into a classroom together, they will be able to learn at their own level.  On the other side of the spectrum, by removing the gifted children out of the classroom, it gives the other children remaining in the classroom the ability to rise to new levels within their own learning environment and learn at their own pace.  I believe that technology and teacher training are key to making the ability grouping opportunity work.

Tracy Fisher- Place 7 Candidate-

I strongly support academic ability grouping, differentiation, acceleration, and curriculum compacting.  I also support flipped classrooms and blended learning.  Various curricular strategies should be used to engage gifted children.  I believe the top priority should be at the elementary level where, for some reason, there continues to be push back on improving the academic rigor for gifted children.  Research and best practices regarding pedagogy for all students is readily available and should be carefully considered when making educational decisions.

5.  How would you address the funding gap for continuing education needs in GT?

Carrie Clark- Place 6 Candidate-

I don’t think we as a school district would be doing our job if we were not challenging all of our students to their abilities.  In regard to gifted education, we would not be doing our jobs if we do not continue to fund the programs that provide this challenge to our gifted students.  Just over  20% of the CISD student population is identified as gifted, so decreasing this funding would affect a large number of students.  Therefore funding for gifted education is of great importance to maintain.

Judy Barbo- Place 6 Candidate-

As a board member, I would work collaboratively within the board to ensure funding for all programs that maintain and enhance the exemplary education that make Coppell an exemplary district.  We are fortunate as a district that our students have many choices for challenging programs that meet the strategic planning goals set forth for our district.

Tracy Fisher- Place 7 Candidate-

 As a school board member, I will prioritize training and encourage professional learning networks for educators. My focus will be to continue raising the academic ceilings across our district. The old mantra: “train everyone in GT so that all will be qualified to teach GT students” doesn’t necessarily work for kids and is expensive.  (It is a way to stay “in compliance” while providing a less than effective education for many.)  These kids are gifted 24/7.   We need to redirect the education dollars we spend on them but not necessarily add more money.

General information provided by the candidates:

 Carrie Clark- Place 6 Candidate-

I am a mom of three – a 7th grader, a 5th grader, and a 2nd grader.  All three children have attended CISD schools since they began kindergarten.  We have been a CISD resident for 15 years, having moved here because of the reputation of the school district.  Having younger children will allow me to bring that unique perspective to the school board.  And, if elected, while serving my first term, I will have children in every level (elementary, middle and high).

I have been a committed volunteer in CISD since my oldest began school.   My volunteer  commitment has increased every year.  This year I am serving as the PTO President for Valley Ranch Elementary (my third term), as both  the Assistant Treasurer and the Directory Co-Chair at Coppell Middle School East PTO.  This year I have also served on four district level committees – the Calendar Committee, the District Education Improvement Committee, the Student Health Advisory Committee and the Facilities & Enrollment Committee.

I have made an effort to become more educated about CISD.  I’ve regularly attended board meetings in person for more than one year.  I’ve attended both sessions of iLead (a leadership training) held by the district in the past two years.

My background includes a Master Degree in Professional Accounting and a Bachelor Degree in Marketing.

And last, but certainly not least, I am excited about serving our students!  Being on the board is something I have been thinking about for quite a while, and when the filing period opened,  I was the first one to file for this place.

I hope you agree that my perspective with younger kids, commitment to Coppell education and tireless volunteer background make me the right candidate for the Board of Trustees Place 6.

To see more information about me, please visit www.carrieclark.info

Judy Barbo- Place 6 Candidate-

Judy and her husband Don moved to Coppell in 1992 choosing this location because of the exemplary school system and attractiveness of the small town community feel.  They have 2 children Lauren, a senior at CHS and Jordan, a freshman at CHS.  Both children have been fortunate enough to attend Coppell schools kindergarten through high school.

Judy holds a Bachelor in Business Administration in Accounting degree from Texas Tech University.  She is a CPA currently working part-time on individual clients. Judy and her family attend Valley Ranch Baptist Church

 Judy’s Community/CISD Involvement

Currently:

PTSO President Coppell High School

Coppell Education Foundation, Board of Directors (year 3)

CHS Site Based Committee (year 2)

Past Involvement:

CHS PTSO Vice President

CHS PTSO Datebook Chair

PTO President Coppell Middle School (CMS) EAST (2 years)

PTO Vice President Coppell Middle School (CMS) EAST (1 year)

PTO Treasurer Coppell Middle School (CMS) EAST (2 years)

Principal Selection Committee for CMS East 2007

Teacher of the Year Selection Committees for Austin, CMSE and CHS

PTO President Austin Elementary (2 years)

PTO Treasurer Austin Elementary (2 years)

PTO Membership Austin Elementary (3 years)

PTO Special Events Co-Coordinator (1 year)

Expenditure Committee – Austin, CMSE and CHS

New Tech Exploration Committee

Strategic Planning Committee 2009

iLead CISD leadership conference

CMSE Bronco Club Treasurer (3 years)

Community Involvement:

Past Sunday school teacher (5 years)

Vacation Bible School preschool director (5 years)

Pastor Search Committee (2 terms)

Chairman, Personnel Committee, First Baptist Church (2 years)

Las Colinas CC Women’s Tennis Association Board Member (2 years)

Tracy Fisher- Place 7 Candidate-

I have continued to serve on the CGA board for six years. I have attended numerous professional and parent conferences and have presented for three years.  I view gifted education as a form of R&D for all students and am committed to insuring all students learn at school everyday.

I have regularly attended school board meetings for more than six years, served on 30 district committees, and PTO boards since 1997.  I have also been very involved in the community through Leadership Coppell, Citizens Police Academy, and serving on my homeowners association in various rolls including president.  Currently I am a board member of the Coppell Womens’ Club, serve in Assistance League where I often work with the elderly, including my father who has Alzheimer’s.

I am a lifelong learner, I regularly communicate on gifted and educational issues with people all over the world through Twitter and other social media outlets, blogs, etc. I care deeply about education and am excited about the possibilities for our students and educators.  I would serve the children in our district with intensity and compassion.  I would be honored by your support on May 12!

Please visit TracyFisher.org for a closer look at her unique qualifications.

____________________________________________________________

CGA does not support any candidate and offers these responses as a service to its members to help you make an informed decision on Election Day.  Regardless of who you support, please get out there and have your voice heard on May 12th.

2012 Summer Educator Scholarships. Deadline: May 20

April 13, 2012

CGA has decided to offer a limited number of educator scholarships for programs offered during the summer months, 2012.

Are you a CISD educator (and CGA member) interested in gaining some additional training and enrichment?

Parents, please forward this to your favorite teacher!  By enriching and supporting our amazing educators, we improve the educational experiences for everyone.

2012 Summer Scholarship Application (click here).  Deadline: May 20, 2012.

Some conferences that educators might be interested in attending with these scholarships (although this is certainly not an exhaustive list — if you wish to attend a summer conference that furthers the mission of CGA, please complete the application for consideration):

IB Conference of the Americas: The 2012 conference in Mexico is the perfect professional development opportunity for heads of schools, coordinators, teachers, district and school board officials of IB World Schools as well as university and government representatives throughout the Americas.  This is a unique opportunity to hear from Tony Wagner, Sarah Kay, and Colin Hiles along with featured speakers and seasoned breakout presenters sharing best practices in international education. (July 12-15).

AP Annual Conference: The AP Annual Conference in Walt Disney World, Florida is the largest professional development gathering of the Advanced Placement Program® and Pre-AP® communities, AP Coordinators, school counselors and administrators from across the United States and throughout the world. This year’s conference promises to engage, inspire and promote innovation in our schools. (July 18-22).

SENG: Most conferences about giftedness focus primarily on educational issues. While a few presentations about the social and emotional development and needs of gifted people and the challenges facing the gifted population may be included, these presentations play a minor role.  This SENG conference reverses the priorities. SENG believes that recognizing, understanding, and accepting the unique social and emotional needs of this population are the first priorities for teachers, parents, and counselors. SENG supports strong gifted education programs, but we believe the emotional piece is the foundation for the development of healthy, happy, well-adjusted, appropriately educated, and contributing gifted members of society. (July 13-14)

Confratute: Confratute is the longest running summer institute on enrichment-based differentiated teaching held at the University of Connecticut for over 30 years!  Confratute is a combined CONFerence, and an instiTUTE with a lot of FRATernity in between. This year’s Confratute is geared toward providing educators with research-based practical strategies for engagement and enrichment learning for all students, as well as meeting the needs of gifted and talented students. (July 8-13)

Learning and the Brain: These conferences and summer institutes bring cutting-edge neuroscience and educational research directly from the researchers themselves to educators, clinicians, counselors, speech-language and special education professionals to improve their practice. Power of Mindsets (June 26-29), Innovation by Design (July 17-20), Neuroscience in the Classroom (July 24-27, July 31-Aug 3).

The 10th International Dabrowski Congress will take place July 19-21 in Denver, Colorado. The schedule includes opportunities to learn about Dabrowski’s theories of heightened sensitivity (a.k.a. “overexcitabilities“) and positive disintegration (and how they may apply to gifted individuals).

Edufest, “the Northwest’s premiere summer conference on gifted and talented education,” will take place July 22-27 this year in Boise, Idaho. Similar to Hormel and Confratute, Edufest is another in-depth learning opportunity featuring strands, keynotes, special topics sessions, and evening gatherings.

The Hormel Foundation Gifted and Talented Education Symposium, June 10-14, in Austin, Minnesota. This in-depth opportunity includes 2012 Keynote Addresses.pdf, an optional full-day tailored to 2012 Administrator Day Sessions and Schedule.pdf, two 2012 Pre Conference Session Descriptions.pdf (one aimed at parents and one aimed at those new to Gifted Education), and dozens of national-expert-presented 2012 General Sessions Descriptions.pdf from which to choose. Thanks in large part to a generous grant from the Hormel Foundation that helps to cover costs, this incredible week is a screaming deal at only $175. 2012 Schedule of Events.pdf

There are many other conferences that emphasize meeting the needs of gifted students — contact Stacy Price, our scholarship chair, if you have questions.

2012 Summer Scholarship Application (click here).  Deadline: May 20, 2012.

Lisa Ricciardelli reflects on 2012 National Art Education Association’s Annual Convention

April 12, 2012

I attended the National Art Education Association’s Annual Convention. The following 3 sessions proved to be most relevant to my work with gifted students plus the most thought-provoking and motivating in my experience at the conference:

1. Teaching with Artful Thinking Strategies: Developed by Harvard’s Project Zero – Through Project Zero Researchers I learned some terrific high-level thinking/questioning strategies which promote creative mindsets. Excellent examples can be found here. NOTE: I find these strategies from the webpage to be best for use with GT students in the elementary Art (and other subject) classroom: ‘Creative Hunt’, ‘Creative Questions’, ‘Does it fit?’, and ‘Options Explosion’. I look forward to sharing these and other constructive thinking strategies with colleagues.

2. Fusing Brain-Based Teaching, Training, and the Visual Arts: A K-12 Case Study: Developed by the Center for Transformative Teaching & Learning – In this session we explored the question, ‘How do students best learn?’ Through educational neuroscience we know that teachers must tactically incorporate understanding of various learning modalities and incorporate multisensory learning into the curriculum for students to best learn. Arts participation has been consistently linked to better academic performance. This is largely because the Arts are inherently multisensory and do uphold diverse learning modalities. The arts can enhance spatial reasoning, attention, thinking habits, motivation, and collaboration. Arts activities naturally incorporate factors that are known in cognitive psychology to improve long-term memory for information, rousing active retrieval of factual knowledge.  The following books are highly praised publications presented to us in this seminar on the topic of educational neuroscience:

3. Creative Classroom: A Professional Development Program Focused on Creativity and Thinking – This seminar provided strategies to ignite creative and critical thinking, paying close attention to cultural forces found in classrooms. We focused on the inquiry process, the role of creative and critical thinking, and successful  innovative teaching practices. The importance of establishing a collaborative culture in the school was emphasized in this lecture and I found it particularly helpful to my role as Art Specialist working with gifted students.

Better education is cumulatively co-produced over time by a variety of experts contributing to an evolving method. Therefore it is essential that teachers work together toward goals for instruction while students also collaborate in order to facilitate better learning. Research indicates that the needs of students who are gifted can be met in the inclusive classroom if the students are appropriately grouped and teachers balance instructional strategies to the specific learning needs of the students.

Collaborating with our campus GT specialist in order to ascertain information on students in the program, in addition to sharing ideas for the Art and GT classrooms is vital to student success. I’ve gathered  many creativity exercises and hands-on art activities that could certainly contribute to the learning of students in our GT program here in CISD… some of which I picked up from this NAEA 2012 conference.

Lisa Ricciardelli

Art Teacher

Austin Elementary

TALENT Act: Don’t Leave Gifted Students Behind

April 11, 2012

Don’t Leave Gifted Students Behind

High achievers are essential to global competition

By Frances R. Spielhagen as published in Education Week, February 21, 2012.

The annual wars, aka school budget deliberations, are about to begin. Across the nation, states and local districts will once more struggle to maintain educational integrity in the face of annual budget shortfalls, “race to the top” to grab federal dollars, and, hopefully, improve overall student achievement.

Yet, as all eyes are focused on making sure that most, if not all, students meet minimum standards, one group continues to suffer from a kind of benign neglect that actually is not benign at all. These are the very students who can succeed at the highest levels, our gifted students. In classrooms from coast to coast, these students are languishing. They are simply not progressing and learning commensurate with their potential.

Last fall, a report from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute brought into sharp focus the decline in achievement among the top students in our nation, those with the potential and demonstrated capacity to excel in school and assume leadership roles in the United States and the global community. Quite simply, the report, titled “Do High Flyers Maintain Their Performance: Performance Trends of Top Students,”suggested that this nation’s brightest students are the unintended victims of the lofty goals of the No Child Left Behind Act. Rather than making the much-heralded “adequate yearly progress” that is supposed to characterize school success, they are losing ground when their performance is tracked over time.

The Fordham report followed a Program for International Student Assessment, or PISA,report in December 2010. Not only had a majority of 15-year-old students in the United States lagged in mathematics and science performance, but America’s top students compared dismally with their peers across the globe. In math, only 1.9 percent of U.S. students scored in the 95th percentile on the assessment’s highest proficiency level, below the average of 3 percent of the total sample of students from other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development-member nations, and well below the top students in South Korea (7.8 percent), Switzerland (7.8 percent), Singapore (15.6 percent), and Shanghai (26.6 percent).

“In a nation devoted to the underdog, we seem to have forgotten that gifted students need to grow, too.”
 Why can’t more of our brightest students attain this high level of proficiency? And, why should we care? Here’s why: Providing for the continued growth, development, and achievement of our most capable students is akin to betting on the favorite. The most-talented students are most likely to bring this nation out of the economic basement, create new inventions, cure deadly diseases, and, yes, restore the United States to its former place as the international leader in innovation and scholarship. In a nation devoted to the underdog, we seem to have forgotten that gifted students need to grow, too. In fact, in many ways, gifted students are the new underdogs in American education.

Our struggle to bring all students up to a minimum level of proficiency is a laudable and necessary goal. However, attention to the majority has caused the nation to lose sight of the equally valid learning needs of the most-capable students in our care. Several factors have created this situation. First, fears of elitism permeate our collective understanding of the role of schools in a democracy. Second, justifiable rejection of rigid tracking policies has resulted in few grouping options for students who can learn more quickly than their peers, while classroom instruction remains at a uniformly homogenous level.

No one wants to see any student condemned to substandard education, a result of some tracking systems. However, the brightest students are condemned to working at levels below their potential. At the same time, acceleration to the next grade is often not considered or even allowed, despite research-based evidence, such as the 2004 report “A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students,” that documents the benefits of acceleration for our top students. Finally, most teachers have not been trained to work with highly able students in the regular classroom, and that’s where most of the high-flying students can be found.

In the past decade, the emphasis on standardized testing has resulted in an information-retrieval model of instruction and assessment, rather than the problem-solving and higher-order thinking on which advanced learners thrive. Struggling to improve the performance of the majority of students, teachers often have neither the skill nor the will to differentiate instruction to meet the needs of their highest-performing students.

Last year, U.S. Reps. Elton Gallegly, R-Calif., and Donald M. Payne, D-N.J., along with U.S. Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Robert P. Casey Jr., D-Pa., introduced a bipartisan bill as part of the reauthorization process for the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, currently known as No Child Left Behind. The TALENT (To Aid Gifted and High-Ability Learners by Empowering the Nation’s Teachers) Act would require that state assessments capture when students perform above grade level and report the educational growth of the most-advanced students on state report cards required under NCLB. This would represent a critical improvement in the current reporting system and drive schools to consider the educational development of the highest-achieving students. It would also spur policymakers and curriculum developers to provide more-advanced curriculum for high-achieving students. It would expand professional-development opportunities for teachers and establish research initiatives to explore ways that teachers can support and serve high-ability students. The bill is still awaiting action in Congress.

As a former high school teacher and coordinator of programs for gifted students, I know firsthand the frustrations of the very capable student who must slog through drill-and-kill reviews every fall while teachers ensure that everyone is up to speed and ready to move forward. The situation repeats itself throughout the school year, as teachers and students progress toward the annual standardized tests that will be used to determine individual teachers’ effectiveness.

The focus on teacher accountability has accentuated the very real pressures on teachers to make sure that all students perform at an accepted level of proficiency, and I am in no way suggesting that teachers are maliciously neglecting the brightest students in their classes. However, when one’s job security is on the line, good will and the intention to differentiate instruction for highly able students easily fall prey to meeting the needs of the majority. If gifted youngsters already meet the minimum-proficiency standards, there is no need to move them forward. For now, there is no federal mandate to meet their academic needs.

Moreover, the states lack the grit, will, and resources to provide for these students. The TALENT Act would provide resources for highly able students and for professional development that would foster advanced teaching in the regular classroom. The students are there, waiting and longing to be instructed at the levels they are capable of attaining. How much longer must they—and we—wait?

Frances R. Spielhagen is an associate professor of education and the co-director of the Center for Adolescent Research and Development at Mount Saint Mary College, in Newburgh, N.Y., and the author of Completing the Equation: The Algebra Solution to Mathematics Reform (Teachers College Press, 2011). From 2009 to 2011, she co-chaired the education committee of the National Association for Gifted Children. She is the editor-in-chief of the Middle Grades Research Journal.

Summer MOSAIC Lego Robotics — New Session added

April 11, 2012

Register now.  Many of our MOSAIC summer enrichment classes are full and the rest are filling up quickly.

MOSAIC Lego Robotics (beginner) classes filled up in record time.  To respond to this increased demand, we are adding an additional class.

During the June session, students may now take Lego Robotics (beginner) from 12:30-2p.

Students will have a lunch break from 12p-12:30p.

Enroll quickly.  MOSAIC classes are filling up quickly.

CGA member pricing:
- 2 classes in the same week for $155 (plus any material fees)
- 3 classes  in the same week for $220 (plus any material fees)

Click HERE for more information and to register.

2012-13 CGA Volunteer Opportunities

April 10, 2012

Are you interested in supporting the GT students in Coppell ISD and beyond?

Are you interested in having an insider’s view of gifted education on the local, state, and national level?

Are you interested in learning more about CGA through more active participation?

Perhaps you’d like to serve on the Executive Board?  Or get your feet wet on a CGA Committee?  There are several ways to serve so please take a look at the following opportunities.

Board Positions:

  • President and Communications Chair
  • First Vice President and Program Chair – Speakers and Student Enrichment
  • Second Vice President and Fundraising Chair
  • Secretary
  • Treasurer
  • Membership Officer
  • Library Officer
  • Newsletter Officer
  • Legislative Officer
  • Publicity Officer
  • Webmaster
  • Competition Coordinator

Committees:

  • Communications
  • MOSAIC (Summer Enrichment Coordinator)
  • G/T Faculty Recognition
  • Nominating
  • Programs
  • Scholarship

For more information about the duties of the positions or for more information, please contact Elizabeth Chappell.  You may also visit the About page to read the CGA bylaws which give details about the duties as well.

An Evening of Introductions and Illuminations

March 19, 2012

Join us for

“The Big Picture – CISD’s Gifted and Talented Program for K-12”

Presented by Todd Kettler, CISD Director of Advanced Academics

and

Meet the School Board Candidates

Location: CHS Lecture Hall

(Located near the school cafeteria, we will have signs posted. Park on the west side near the practice field, or on the east side near the horseshoe)

Date: Thursday, May 3rd at 7 pm

___________________________________________________________________________

Since its inception in 2006, CGA has provided opportunities to inform – inform parents, inform educators, inform students, and inform voters.  On May 3rd, CGA will continue this service by hosting a night to share more knowledge with you, including information about the Coppell ISD Trustee candidates for Places 6 and 7 and a presentation about the Gifted and Talented program in Coppell ISD through all grades.

The Meet the Candidates portion of the evening is first on the agenda, whereby the school board candidates will briefly introduce themselves to the audience.

Following this, Todd Kettler will give a complete view of the GT program available in CISD.  While you may have heard some of this information in the past, this will be the first time you hear it all in one seating, in one night, giving the full picture.

Event is FREE and OPEN TO ALL who are interested in attending.

___________________________________________________________________________

CGA does not endorse or support any candidate.

Regardless of who you support, we hope you will make your voice heard during early voting or on May 12 Election Day.

Creative Writing Competition party and book orders

March 3, 2012

Congratulations to everyone who received 1st place or honorable mention in our annual creative writing competition.

Book release party

April 4, 2012

5:45p

Coppell High School Cafeteria

Don’t forget to place your book orders (click on Creative Writing Books in left column). Pre-ordered books cost $17 each book, including tax and shipping (1st place winners will receive one complimentary copy) before March 20, 2012. Books will be $20 plus shipping after March 20. A small number of extra copies will be available at the book release party — for the $20 price. Pre-order to guarantee your copy and the discount pricing.

Special guest: Pam Cope, author of Jantsen’s Gift, who has appeared on Oprah Winfrey and has been featured in articles in the New York Times and others.  Mark your calendar now.  Everyone is welcome to attend.

Video Game Design (Beginner). New session added!

February 24, 2012

MOSAIC Video Game Design (beginner) classes filled up in record time.  To respond to this increased demand, we are adding an additional class.

During the June session, students may now take VGD (beginner) from 12:30-2p.

Students will have a lunch break from 12p-12:30p.

Enroll quickly.  We still have a few openings in App Design and VGD (Advanced/3D) in the July session, both of which require VGD (Beginner) as a pre-requisite.

CGA member pricing:
- 2 classes in the same week for $155 (plus any material fees)
- 3 classes  in the same week for $220 (plus any material fees)

Click HERE for more information and to register.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 429 other followers