Renew your CGA membership for 2011-2012
Time to renew your annual CGA membership with a GREAT deal! Thanks to our negotiations with TAGT, CGA is offering a fantastic opportunity to join BOTH active gifted associations, CGA and TAGT. We are one of a very select parent affiliate groups in Texas that is allowed to offer this opportunity so we hope you’ll take advantage of it. Please see below for the amazing benefits you’ll receive, and more importantly, by joining both associations, you are providing a bigger, stronger voice for gifted education in Coppell, Texas, and the United States.
Want to know more about the benefits of joining CGA? Click the “join” tab above.
Membership period: August 15, 2011 – August 14, 2012
| PARENT Membership Options | |
Coppell Gifted Association only-
|
$20 |
CGA and TAGT(Texas Association for the Gifted & Talented) parent memberships
|
$45 |
CGA and TAGT(Texas Association for the Gifted & Talented) educator level
|
$75 |
| EDUCATOR Membership Options | |
| Coppell Gifted Association only (see benefits under Parent) | $20 |
CGA and TAGT (Texas Association for the Gifted & Talented) educator level
|
$75 |
(form updated Feb 1, 2012)
Don’t miss out on this GREAT deal. Renew online by clicking here.
If you have questions regarding membership, please contact our membership chair, Joan Bush.
If you have difficulties with registering online, please contact Carrie Clark.
Summer MOSAIC classes are posted
Check out all of the options for your current 3rd-7th grader for fun, educational, inspirational summer enrichment. http://coppellgifted.org/mosaic/summer-mosaic/
Parent Discussion Group now forming (SENG)

Parenting Discussion Groups
SENG = Supporting Emotional Needs of the Gifted
February 20 – April 9, 2012 (Mondays)
11:30-1p, bring your lunch
location TBD
click HERE to REGISTER
CGA Members Only (JOIN NOW)


Join us for a Guided Discussion Group for
Parents of Bright/Gifted/Talented Students
Based on the SENG Model
Learn strategies for managing the unique social and emotional needs of your bright/gifted/talented child by networking with other parents in a relaxed, guided discussion format. The emphasis is on positive aspects of parenting, avoiding power struggles, and helping these children learn appropriate life skills while enhancing the parent/child relationship.
Over a period of eight weeks, you
will explore:
- Characteristics of gifted children
- Communication
- Dealing with motivation & Underachievement
- Discipline & Self-management
- Stress & Depression
- Peers & Acquaintances
- Only children & Siblings
- Parent/child relationship
Where:
To be determined
When:
Mondays, Feb 20-April 9, 11:30a-1p (bring your lunch)
Cost:
$60 per couple/individual
Includes:
- 350+ page comprehensive book, A Parent’s Guide to Gifted Children
- Weekly handouts
- Access to free lending library
REGISTER HERE
space is limited.
Sonya May reflects on TAGT 2011
Thank you so much for the scholarship to attend the TAGT conference in Austin. It was a very inspiring conference, in which I attended a number of wonderful sessions!
A few of my favorite sessions that I attended included Bertie Kingore’s “Tiered Instruction: 35 Ways to Make it Work,” “Web 2.0 in the Gifted Classroom,” “Digital Thinking 3.Know,” and “Best Practices for GT kids in K-2.”
I got so many amazing ideas to use in my classroom and was able to implement many new ideas immediately upon returning to work.
I learned a variety of tiered activities in Dr. Kingore’s session that could be used instantly in my classroom. I have already used a “thinking triangle” with literature and “math fingers” to help the children not only improve their math skills, but non-verbal communication skills as well. Dr. Kingore gave us a number of wonderful activities that could be adapted for our classrooms. In addition, she provided us with several useful websites, some of which I was able to post to my website for student use. I have already been able to share a number of new ideas with my teammates.
The technology sessions that I attended on Web 2.0 tools provided me with a plethora of ideas for my classroom. Upon returning to school, I immediately taught my students (and first grade teammates) how to create a wordle on “Tagxedo” as a culmination activity for our study of plants. It was a great way for the students to process what they had learned in a new and exciting way!
I took a lot of notes throughout the conference and have already shared some of the ideas with co-workers. I plan to share a lot more of the ideas through a training that I (as well as the other teachers who attended the conference) will provide for the staff at Lakeside.
Feel free to share any of my responses with the CGA community. Once again, I appreciate you giving me the opportunity to grow as an educator.
Thank you,
Sonya May
1st Grade Teacher
Lakeside Elementary
Coppell ISD
Brown bag discussion with Todd Kettler. Gifted: What should it mean?

Gifted: What should it mean?
NAGC recently advocated for a new definition of “gifted” that differs greatly from any current view. This new definition emphasizes:
1) psychosocial and cognitive variables
2) developmental model:
potential –> achievement –> eminence
How could this new definition impact the future of gifted education?
Brown Bag Discussion with
Todd Kettler,
CISD Director of Advanced Academics
Feb 15 & Feb 29, 12 noon
FREE
CGA Members only
Space is limited. Priority given to Symposium attendees.
To register, contact:
Elizabeth Chappell, CGA President.
Want to find out more? Check out Todd’s article that describes the changes by clicking here.
Creative Writing Competition — Final Results 2011-12
Congratulations to everyone who participated in the Competition this year. Here are the final results.
We will be taking book orders starting February 8, 2012 (click on Creative Writing Books in left column). Pre-ordered books cost $17 each book, including tax and shipping (1st place winners will receive one complimentary copy) before March 20, 2012. Books will be $20 plus shipping after March 20. A small number of extra copies will be available at the book release party — for the $20 price. Pre-order to guarantee your copy and the discount pricing.
Book Release party is April 4 at 5:45p. Special guest: Pam Cope, author of Jantsen’s Gift, who has appeared on Oprah Winfrey and has been featured in articles in the New York Times and others. Mark your calendar now. Everyone is welcome to attend.
Here are the 1st Place recipients and Honorable Mentions (the stories of each of these students will appear in the book). In each category, the 1st place recipient was selected as the entry with the highest ranking in the category; honorable mentions include all entries that received either a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd ranking from each judge. Honorable mentions are listed below in alphabetical order.
|
Judging category: |
Results: |
First Name: |
Last Name: |
Title: |
| Fiction 3 | 1st Place | Anvita | Ukidwe | A Magical Acorn |
| Honorable Mention | Jenny | Ji | Into The Cave | |
| Honorable Mention | Yashasvi | Karri | Victory | |
| Honorable Mention | Matthew | Li | Donald the Duck | |
| Honorable Mention | Aryan | Pal | The Haunted Sausage | |
| Honorable Mention | Rachel | Sun | True Love | |
| Fiction 4 | 1st Place | Isabelle | Hernandez | Four Seasons, Two Perspectives |
| Honorable mention | Rithik | Chennupati | 2011 In Princeton | |
| Honorable mention | Sohom | Ghosh | Golok and His Alien Friends | |
| Honorable mention | Ananya | Prakash | Jill’s Halloween Adventure | |
| Honorable mention | Aneesh | Sharma | Life from a Gorilla’s Perspective | |
| Honorable mention | Benjamin | Wang | Artificial Supernova | |
| Fiction 5 | 1st Place | Manasi | Ramadurgum | The Tale of an Average Pencil |
| Honorable mention | Mihira | Gore | My Unfinished World | |
| Honorable mention | Chaeyeon | Han | The Three Wolves and the Big Bad Pig | |
| Honorable mention | Nisha | Singh | Beatrice and Wonderland | |
| Honorable mention | Kelly | Wei | Within Reach | |
| Fiction 6 | 1st Place | Ardi | Saunders | Huff and Puff and Blew–from a different point of view |
| Honorable mention | Zachary | Eckley | Invasion | |
| Honorable mention | Abbie | Hall | Escape | |
| Honorable mention | Pranjal | Jain | Face-to-Face with Androids | |
| Honorable mention | Asad | Khawaja | Journey to Calispur | |
| Honorable mention | Ashna | Pathan | Count Dracula’s Revenge | |
| Honorable mention | Minjung | Yu | They Called Me Hope | |
| Fiction 7-8 | 1st Place | Abhi | Manivannan | The Thing with Feathers |
| Honorable Mention | Nikita | Belathur | Stolen | |
| Honorable Mention | Seoyon | Lee | Prince’s Story of Cinderella | |
| Honorable mention | Aditi | Mukund | The Beauty of Friendship | |
| Honorable Mention | Manasa | Muppirala | The Mistake | |
| Honorable Mention | Aviral | Somani | Cobra Connection | |
| Fiction High School | 1st Place | Kelly | Hall | Doppelganger |
| Honorable mention | Aimee | Hyndman | Guardian | |
| Honorable mention | Prerana | Ramadurgum | Lost | |
| Honorable mention | Lexie | Yut | A Tale of Two | |
| Non-fiction Elementary | 1st Place | Maddie | Hulcy | Unexpected Fun |
| Honorable mention | Chaeyeon | Han | When the Relatives Visited | |
| Honorable mention | Akansha | Singh | Decisions | |
| Honorable mention | Manasa | Vemaraju | Boston Tea Party – The act for freedom | |
| Non-fiction High | 1st Place | Rachel | Sandle | Something New |
| Honorable mention | Raga | Ayyagari | Thanksgiving | |
| Honorable mention | Joshua | Chanin | Finding My Voice | |
| Honorable mention | Jessica | Chavarro | Goodbye Lady | |
| Honorable mention | V | Karri | Permission | |
| Honorable mention | Brianna | Williams | The Product of a Real Family | |
| Honorable mention | Lexie | Yut | Shower for the Soul | |
| Non-fiction Middle | 1st Place | Ananya | Rajesh | St. Eustace |
| Honorable mention | Sara | Koh | The Unfinished puzzle | |
| Honorable mention | Aditi | Mukund | A Broken Childhood | |
| Honorable mention | Nathan | Sims | The Accident | |
| Honorable mention | Shruti | Vellaturi | Our Texas | |
| Honorable mention | Minjung | Yu | Just a Simple Seed | |
| Poetry 11-12 | 1st Place | Aadam | Husain | Heart Beats On |
| Honorable mention | Petra | Antoine | Jealousy | |
| Honorable mention | Raga | Ayyagari | Different | |
| Honorable mention | Sneha | Ayyagari | For the Redwood | |
| Honorable mention | Jessica | Chavarro | Light Through The Confusion | |
| Honorable mention | Kelly | Stewart | Alzheimer’s Disease | |
| Poetry 3 | 1st Place | Sarina | Bhattacharya | Summer Time Fun |
| Honorable Mention | Jenny | Ji | The Mouse | |
| Honorable Mention | Isabella | Zeff | A Quiet Town | |
| Poetry 4 | 1st Place | Emilie | Sangerhausen | The Cat |
| Honorable Mention | Vanuli | Arya | What It Is | |
| Honorable Mention | Langston | Gardner | How Blessed I Am | |
| Honorable Mention | Aneesh | Sharma | Piano Keys | |
| Honorable Mention | Carrie | Sheffield | Forests | |
| Poetry 5 | 1st Place | Manasi | Ramadurgum | Inside my Sister’s Pocket |
| Honorable Mention | Almira | Rajwani | Bluberry field | |
| Honorable Mention | Stella | Yan | Rain | |
| Poetry 6 | 1st Place | Ashley | Rivera | Unique |
| Honorable mention | nikki | falk | Think | |
| Honorable mention | Hannah | Hohman | Goal | |
| Honorable mention | Christine | Ji | Hope | |
| Honorable mention | Sarah | Low | Endurance | |
| Honorable mention | Lauren | McCord | Anything in the World | |
| Honorable mention | Reyna | Rivas | Your Best Friend | |
| Honorable mention | Minjung | Yu | Angels Don’t Always Have Wings | |
| Poetry 7 | 1st Place | Meara | Isenberg | The Beach |
| Honorable mention | Nikita | Belathur | The Meanest of Them All | |
| Honorable mention | Hiran | Buyyanapragada | Our Home Planet | |
| Honorable mention | BILAL | HAQUE | Fear | |
| Honorable mention | Abhi | Manivannan | The Girl and the Maple Tree | |
| Honorable mention | Manasa | Muppirala | The Best Day Ever | |
| Honorable mention | Veronica | Nguyen | On The Outside and Inside | |
| Honorable mention | Trinity | Sullivan | Steadfast In A Revolution | |
| Poetry 8 | 1st Place | Ananya | Rajesh | The South |
| Honorable mention | Hriju | Adhikari | Life As We Know It | |
| Honorable mention | Sanskriti | Agarwal | Mother Nature | |
| Honorable mention | Gayatri | Godithi | How to spend life | |
| Honorable mention | Surbhi | Kumar | Don’t Wing it | |
| Honorable mention | Arthi | Tarugu | The Art of Unmoving | |
| Poetry 9-10 | 1st Place | Katy | Li | Wishbone |
| Honorable mention | Kelly | Hall | Dear Shadow | |
| Honorable mention | Jessica | Kelly | Gray Blanket | |
| Honorable mention | Emaan | Majed | Demands | |
| Honorable mention | Aparna | Panatpur | A New World Acrostic Poem | |
| Honorable mention | Prerana | Ramadurgum | New Kid | |
| Honorable mention | Lexie | Yut | Waiting |
CGA Symposium — Student Registration is almost full
Have you been waiting to register for the student enrichment sessions of the Symposium? Don’t wait any longer. We only have 6 spots left in K-2, a few more in 3-5th grade. These openings will be filled on a first come basis. Please note that our registration system is not completely up to the minute — your registration will not be confirmed until you hear from our Student Enrichment Coordinator. If you have questions about availability, please contact Aanchal Prakash.
Register here: http://coppellgifted.org/events/symposium/
A parent must attend the symposium during the time the child is participating in the student enrichment.
We hope to see you at the upcoming CGA Symposium events: Feb 2 and Feb 4. If you have any questions about this event, please contact Elizabeth Chappell.
Good Luck Destination Imagination (DI) teams!

The North Central Texas Regional DI Tournament will be held February 25, 2012. Teams from Carrollton-Farmers Branch, Lewisville, Denton, Coppell, Perrin-Whitt, Decatur and Vernon along with some private and charter schools located within the boundaries of the above counties. To find out more about this competition, please click here.
Congratulations and good luck to all of the teams that will be representing Coppell in the upcoming tournament!
Rising Stars:
Denton Creek & Austin: Christy McGregor, team manager.
Lakeside: Rupal Chiniwala, team manager.
Lakeside: Mary Creason, team manager.
Lakeside: Kelly Aguilar, team manager.
Cottonwood Creek: Nicole Frieder, team manager.
Cottonwood Creek: Tiffany Gresham, team manager.
Denton Creek & Wilson: Bindi Patel, team manager.
Competitive:
Lakeside: Swada Mahabaleshwarkar & Priyanka Katiyar, , team managers.
Denton Creek: Madhulika Saxena, team manager.
Wilson: Sneha Patel, team manager.
DI engages students through different challenges that push them to expand their creative problem solving abilities. The end product has to be entirely created by the children. If you are interested in finding out more about DI, contact our Coppell DI Coordinator, Linda Beeker at linda0402@verizon.net.
Symposium registration for student enrichment
The student enrichment classes — for students while their parents attend our symposium — are filling up quickly.
Sign up your child now for the special enrichment sessions for students in grades K-2 and grades 3-5. Students will spend the day investigating principles of science, forces of nature, music and/or improvisation in sessions designed to challenge them to think quickly and creatively . Click here for details about the individual sessions and registration information.
The Grass is Always Greener… lessons from a year abroad.
The grass is always greener…
We just returned to CISD after spending a year abroad. Our children (aged 11 and 6) both went to a top-notch school, a prestigious International (American curriculum) school with a wonderful state-of-the-art campus and a great reputation. Both my children, but especially my 11 year old, learned what it was like to be removed from their comfort zones and adjust to a completely new environment and culture. They became more confident, and able to handle change more effectively. They began to learn another language in a totally different script. By its very nature, attending an international school meant that they had friends from all over the world.
These experiences of living abroad and being immersed in another culture cannot be marginalized in any way. These are learnings for life, which we cannot get from a book or the Internet, which we can only understand from experience.
And yes, it was an enriching and rewarding experience, an exciting journey, a thrilling chapter in our book of life. Yet there was something that made us look back at every turn, and compare. Perhaps if we had moved there from any place other than Coppell and CISD, we might have felt differently, but that we can only speculate on. There was something that kept us from saying, yes, this is where we see ourselves ten or fifteen years from now, that this is the school we want our children to graduate from.
We were quick to compare everything at the international school with our experience here at CISD. And my conclusion was, that in a way, CISD spoils you. The teacher-student-parent involvement spoils you. The sense of community spoils you. We are quick to assume that our school will work with us to figure out what is best for our children. We assume and we take for granted, because that is what we know, that is what we have experienced here in Coppell. And when we step away, we realize, that what we have here in Coppell is really quite special. Only when we look in from the outside do we realize just how green the grass is in Coppell.
So I have put down my observations, and let me add a disclaimer here. These are my observations based on one year abroad, at one international school and in one country. Perhaps my opinion might have changed had we been there longer. Perhaps my opinion might be different had we gone to a different school in either place. Perhaps I’d have had a different viewpoint in another country. They are in no way a generalization, and this is in no way an expert opinion. It is just my viewpoint, as a parent, and it may not necessarily be correct. With that out of the way, here are my thoughts-
It is hard to build a sense of community in an international school when there is high teacher turnover. Teachers typically come in on a contract, moving on to the next best country when their contract is over. For some teachers (and certainly not all), it is just an exciting way to see the world, which is fine for them but not so great for my child. Call me selfish but I want the teacher to be there, not because its base camp to see Egypt or Jordan or Bhutan but because she wants to teach, to enrich, to be involved and to participate, in the overall growth of my child.
It is hard to build a community when there is high student turnover. International postings are typically transient and students are used to kids coming and going. It just becomes a part of daily life, like a train station or an airport. There is one set of core students, and another set of students that come and go. Families extend their winter and summer breaks because they have to travel home, pulling students out of class early. All this results in a disruption of the normalcy, a change in the class dynamic and rhythm of teaching.
Many of the students in the school are seasoned expats even at age 10. New students are just one of many that will enter the class in a given year and they have to learn very quick how to fit in, and adapt to their new environment. They become very resilient to change and that can be both good and not so good. Good, because they learn very early on to adapt. Great, because they learn networking skills at a very young age. Not so good, because friendships tend to be fleeting, many knowing they will not last more than 2 or 3 years.
There was no concept of differentiation or ability based instruction. There was no concept of GT. There was no pull out, push in, clustering or acceleration for gifted children. None of the terms that we have grown so used to hearing, none of the terms that we take for granted here in Coppell. You cannot take a CBE exam at any stage. There is some differentiation beginning in grade 7 or 8, but nothing before that. All students were equal. However it was very apparent that all students were not equal. Not because I think my daughter is all that, but because each classroom was a melting pot of students that came from different countries and schools, with major differences in curriculum. Unfortunately, in a subject like math, they catered to the average, the middle, and sometimes even the lowest common denominator. Any concept of “challenge” work meant “more” work, instead of “more challenging or enriching” work
While at CISD, Town Center Elementary gave my daughter a solid grounding in the fundamentals of math. She was kept challenged at school, given individualized instruction, and mostly given the opportunity to learn at her pace. As a result, at the international school she attended, she was way ahead of her peers, and gained the respect of her teachers and classmates in the short time she was there. But she was bored. It was almost too easy for her and she had nothing to keep her interested or motivated. She was not exposed or given the opportunity to learn out of syllabus concepts, she was not given the opportunity to advance beyond the curriculum in any way. Going forward into middle school too, there would have been no opportunity for her to take a GT or pre-AP class, putting her at an immediate disadvantage, if we were to move back to the U.S in Grade 7 or Grade 8.
Going to a fancy private school has its plus points. The specials were naturally very well funded. The PE program was amazing; at an elementary level, the students were rotated through swimming, lacrosse, baseball, basketball, tennis, flag football, soccer and I’m probably leaving something out. The art program was intense, supplies were abundant and the output of the students was really top caliber. In older grades, international field trips to places like Greece and Tanzania, and opportunities for service learning through projects like Habitat for Humanity added excitement, enrichment and experience to their lives. And I’m sure you all would agree that small class sizes and paraprofessionals at every grade level in elementary school is a huge plus.
So if I were given the decision today, to do it all over, would I still want to spend a year abroad? Would I still travel with my family halfway across the world to live in a strange country? Absolutely, without doubt. Change is always good. Change shakes you up from complacency and forces you to adapt. It forces you to reboot. And with every change, with every decision you will have pros and cons, and you will find the balance. The undeniably biggest plus in this case, is the experience that living in another country offers, and the opportunities of networking in future.
Our year abroad was undeniably a wonderful experience, but its great to be back home in Coppell.
Rethinking Giftedness by Todd Kettler
On Thursday, November 3, 2011 most of the nation’s leaders in gifted education gathered in a ballroom at the Hilton Hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana for the NAGC (National Association for Gifted Children) President’s Address by Paula Olszewski-Kubilius. NAGC Presidential Addresses are both opportunity and obligation, and they typically resemble courteous overviews of the workings of the organization or some noteworthy research study. But this one was different. The audience knew it shortly into the speech, and rumblings of the speech continue to this day.
Paula Olszewski-Kubilius proposed a rethinking of giftedness, a new definition. She called it a new paradigm, but I’m always leery of the overuse of that term. However, with a month of reflection, I might argue that paradigm is an appropriate term. Anyone who has read Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has a distinct sense of the gravity of a paradigm shift, disruption of the field, animosity, new hierarchies. Generally paradigms shift slowly and painfully over time. A paradigm is a philosophical or theoretical framework for a discipline within which theories, laws, and generalizations are deduced and experiments are performed. One paradigm fades away when it no longer adequately explains phenomena in the discipline. With that old paradigm generally will go a host of supporters who do not see the promise of a new lens.
The Presidential Address of 2011 was preceded earlier in the year by an article published by Rena Subotnik (American Psychological Association), Paula Olszewski-Kubilius (Northwestern University), and Frank Worrell (University of California-Berkley) in Psychological Science in the Public Interest (Volume 12, Number 1, January 2011). The article, “Rethinking Giftedness: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science,” offers evidence that the old paradigm of giftedness does not adequately explain phenomena and proposes a new definition of giftedness.
In her address, Olszewski-Kubilius explained that gifted education is largely marginalized in the landscape of K-12 education policy and reform. In fact, gifted education specialists are rarely even at the table to discuss new directions in education. Gifted education remains in the minds of much of the public an elitist enterprise that is at best a frill for school districts. Gifted education is optional in many states, and even states that mandate gifted services (i.e. Texas) funding and accountability are so negligible that it remains a low priority for educational leaders. The question of why this is the case rings loud and clear. Given the poor performance of even the most talented students in the United States on international comparisons, would it not make sense to address the policies and services to those we call gifted? These questions are not new, but if we take seriously what Olszweski-Kubilius proposed, the answers to the questions could take the field in quite a new direction.
The definition offered by Subotnik, Olszewski-Kubilius, and Worrell is comprehensive and different from previously accepted definitions delineated in state and federal policy.
Giftedness is the manifestation of performance or production that is clearly at the upper end of the distribution in a talent domain even relative to that of other high-functioning individuals in that domain. Further, giftedness can be viewed as developmental, in that in the beginning stages, potential is the key variable; in later stages, achievement is the measure of giftedness; and in fully developed talents, eminence is the basis on which this label is granted. Psychosocial variables play an essential role in the manifestation of giftedness at every developmental stage. Both cognitive and psychosocial variables are malleable and need to be deliberately cultivated. (Subotnik, Olszewski-Kubilius, & Worrell, 2011, p. 7).
Subtle distinctions of this proposed definition will continue to reveal themselves overtime, but some points of departure are obvious. First, there is more focus on performance. As individuals mature and develop, potential must give way to achievement. Previous definitions and conceptions emphasized an ontological giftedness which suggests that gifted students experience the world differently with or without any level of achievement. Ultimately being gifted is being different. I’ve even heard people say, “He’s so different; he must be gifted.” Second, the proposed definition locates talent development within a specific domain. Different domains have different trajectories of development, different milestones. Giftedness is a label of eminent talent across all domains from gymnastics to mathematics to politics, and how and when those talents are developed vary. For instance, it seems that by the age of 25, one could be a potentially gifted politician, but at the same age one could not be a potentially gifted gymnast. Gymnasts have either achieved eminence or not by the age of 25. Third, the proposed definition suggests new emphasis in the research literature of the field. The most common line of research at this point in gifted education is to study characteristics that distinguish high IQ (gifted) children from average IQ peers. This type of information seems much less relevant to the proposed definition. New emphases may include specific developmental models for how expertise and eminence are achieved or recognized in various talent domains. What are key indicators of potential in early years that suggest one may attain significant achievement in subsequent years? What cognitive and psychological variables matter most in developing talent? Which variable transcend domains and which variable are more unique to certain domains?
For better or worse, we have known for years that identified gifted students are no more likely to achieve eminence than non-identified students. Students who have participated in gifted programs are no more likely to achieve eminence than students who did not participate. The education community and the public at large have asked an emphatic why. As a field we have suggested it may be poor identification, or poor programming. Countless efforts have been made to improve both identification and programming. Resulting eminence for the identified gifted students did not change. There seems to be a repeated rumbling that it doesn’t make sense to talk about a gifted guitarist who doesn’t play guitar very well. Is that what we do when we talk about gifted students who don’t do very well in school? I suggest that is a valid but complex question with answers which are just as complex.
The proposed rethinking suggests that to solve the problems that plague the field, we have to completely change the way we think about giftedness, a paradigm change. We do not overcome elitism, marginalization, and educational neglect by improving the identification system, or cluster grouping, or standards-based professional development. At least that is the lesson that our current situation should teach us. Perhaps it is a good time to rethink.
Subotnik, R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and
gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science.. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 1-54.
